kissmycls
11-27-06, 06:28 PM
From the GGI 2006.
Alec Paxton-HIRED (West. Wash. Alum)
Ex Parli and CEDA debater, I'll listen to any well articulated and well defended
argument. I view the round in a cost-benefits framework unless instructed and convinced otherwise in the round. I prefer substantive over procedural debate,
and depth over breadth, but these are only only preference. I award speaker
points based equally on the quality of your arguments and your ability to
convince me of them. The Rebuttals ought to focus the issues and weight the
impacts/values/etc. so that I don't have to.
Alec Paxton-HIRED (West. Wash. Alum)
Ex Parli and CEDA debater, I'll listen to any well articulated and well defended
argument. I view the round in a cost-benefits framework unless instructed and convinced otherwise in the round. I prefer substantive over procedural debate,
and depth over breadth, but these are only only preference. I award speaker
points based equally on the quality of your arguments and your ability to
convince me of them. The Rebuttals ought to focus the issues and weight the
impacts/values/etc. so that I don't have to.